The Swarthmore Documents: letters from the beginning of Quakerism

The Swarthmore Manuscripts, our famous collection of early Quaker letters, have been described as the “jewel in the crown” of the Library’s collection.  But did you know they are only one part of a larger collection known as the Swarthmore Documents? 

The Swarthmore Documents are a 17th century collection of well over a thousand manuscript papers that belonged to the early Quaker leader Margaret Fell. The collection, with letters describing the legal struggles, personal lives and theological wranglings of early Friends, is now in multiple parts, most of which are held in the Library of the Society of Friends.

The history of how these documents came to the Library is complex. This is reflected in their current order which can be difficult to navigate. To date there is no single complete listing of the collection. However, we have recently produced a guide, which sets out what Margaret’s collection looks like now, how the different parts came to the Library and the best way to start using them for your research. This guide is available here: https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/research-guide-swarthmore-documents-2024

The Swarthmore Documents are one of the most important sources for studying the beginning of the Quaker movement, but readers of the letters should understand that the core of the collection was curated by Margaret and her second husband George Fox, one of the founding figures of Quakerism. The history that the letters relay was shaped by them. 

LSF MS Vol 352/202 – A letter from Thomas Holme to Margaret Fell, 1655. Like many other letters in the collection the blank spaces on this letter have been used for handwriting practice by Sarah Fell, one of Margaret’s daughters.

In 1652 George Fox visited Swarthmoor Hall, the home of Margaret and her husband, Judge Thomas Fell. He spoke at their parish church and made numerous converts to the fledgling Quaker movement, including Margaret herself.  However, at this point she was the mother of 7 children, 3 of whom were under the age of 10, and her youngest daughter Rachel was born the following year. Thomas Fell was an assize judge who was frequently away from home travelling on his circuit. It was harder for Margaret to leave home and travel around preaching as others in the movement were doing. Instead, for most of the 1650s, she remained at Swarthmoor and became the hub of a Quaker information network that stretched across the world.  

Friends would write to her, letting her know the latest news or sending copies of epistles. Where necessary she would have the letters copied and sent on. Margaret wrote many letters herself, offering advice and support to Friends or speaking to those in power. She kept the letters that she was sent, as well as copies of some that she wrote, collecting them together in an archive. Margaret’s role as proto-archivist also involved other Friends sending her their correspondence to be kept or discarded as she saw fit. 

“Fox realised what most people who write their memoirs know: that they can determine what others know of the past by controlling the evidence that gives future generations knowledge of it… no details, no history, my details, my history” – H. Larry Ingle, 1993

George Fox was very aware of the importance of public perception. When the Society of Friends began in the 1650s they were a transgressive religious movement, despised by the established church and looked at with suspicion by those in power. After the return of King Charles II in 1660 this only got worse. George encouraged Friends to create records of their experiences, to define what Quakerism was as they saw it, to avoid being defined for posterity by those who were persecuting them. 

He also exerted control over the material Quakers published. Letters from within the Swarthmore Documents show that he expected to have copy approval over Quaker publications from 1653, a responsibility that was later delegated to Morning Meeting.

LSF MS Vol 354/39 – Excerpt from a letter written to George Fox by Thomas Aldam in 1653. He supports the idea of books being sent to George for review before going to the printers.

Margaret and George had formed an extremely strong partnership in the years following their first meeting and they were married in 1669. They worked together with other Friends to create an identity for Quakerism that would enable them to survive their initial struggles. This meant distancing themselves from extreme acts such as James Naylor’s “blasphemous” recreation of Christ’s entry into Jerusalem and adopting the peace testimony as a defining characteristic. 

After his imprisonment at Worcester in the 1670s, George began to think seriously about his legacy. He came to convalesce at Swarthmoor Hall after his release. Whilst there he dictated his autobiography (later published as his Journal), and sorted through Margaret’s collection of letters, ordering some to be copied for a London-based collection, editing some, and presumably destroying others. His endorsement appears on the majority of the surviving letters.

Margaret held on to the curated documents, which now included the manuscript of George’s autobiography, and added to it letters she received in her later years. It was passed down her family to her grandson John Abraham. John split up the collection. Most of the surviving parts have found their way here to the Library, but some letters made it into collections in the United States, and others remain in private hands.

As part of the George Fox 400 celebrations we want to make these early Quaker letters more accessible. One way of doing that is producing the guide linked above, This will help a researcher to navigate them, but also provides links to existing transcripts that are easily accessible online. We have also been working with the PRINT project, a collaborative digital humanities project based at the University of Central Florida. This project provides access to 17th and 18th century letters from collections in the US, UK, the Netherlands and Germany. The letters relate to European religious minorities and migration across the Atlantic, and many of those selected are part of the Swarthmore Documents. 

We hope this project will make these letters accessible to a wider audience and encourage our readers to look at the letters and give transcription a try. You can find out more and have a go here: https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/printmigrationnetwork/print  

Selected Further Reading 

Ames, M (2017) Margaret Fell, Letters, and the Making of Quakerism. Oxford: Routledge. 

Larry Ingle, H ( 1993) “George Fox, Historian” Quaker History 82(1) pp.28-35. 

Posted in Highlights, Guides | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

GF400: Evolution of George Fox’s image

George Fox (1624-1691) was born in Leicestershire and is one of the founding figures of Quakerism.

Our Library & Archive collections hold many portraits of George Fox, most produced throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. None of the portraits can be authenticated as being made during Fox’s life. Most critics do not think he would have the time or patience to have sat for a portrait. Quakers focussed on concrete forms of expression in writing and preaching. They were avid and prolific publishers of Christian doctrine who travelled extensively.

Regardless, portraits of George Fox and other influential Quakers were made after their deaths because there was a demand and they sold well.

One of the first dedicated books critiquing Quaker portraiture is Wilfred Whitten’s Quaker Pictures, first published in 1897. It is a useful book to refer to though many assertions are from a personal perspective and without reference. One of the portraits Whitten refers to is an oddly interesting picture that shows the moment George Fox aged 30 became enlightened. George Fox, Ætat. 30, a stipple engraving by James Holmes based on the painting by Gerard Honthorst, was published in 1799.

(Library reference: LSF Pic Vol II/22) George Fox by James Holmes, after Gerard van Honthorst published 1799

This engraving was published by Quaker bookseller Thomas Clio Rickman (1761–1834), who at the time owned the 1654 oil painting by Honthorst on which the print is based. In 1932, National Portrait Gallery responded to a query from our then Librarian, confirming that Honthorst was only in England in 1628, when George Fox was only four years old. So he could not have painted him from life! The date of 1654 assigned on the print is questionable. The NPG confirmed that the painting was exhibited in the National Portrait Exhibition of 1866.

Paintings by Dutch artist, Egbert van Heemskerck (1634–1704) are known for satirical scenes of everyday people often in caricature poses. One example is, ‘A Quaker Meeting’ which depicts a gesticulating woman preaching in a dark dowdy space with most people looking indifferent or laughing at her. Many prints were made from this painting and sold as anti-Quaker.

(Library reference: LSF F70) The Quakers Meeting by  E. Heemskerck, c.1685
(Library reference: LSF 85_OV_P26 detail from The Quakers Meeting engraved by Bowles after E. Heemskerck, published c.1723

In William Hull’s article, Heemskerck’s Quaker Meeting, he suggests that George Fox and other known Quakers could have been depicted in this painting made circa 1685. Fox did spend several months in the Netherlands as Quakerism was received positively with a Yearly Meeting set up in Amsterdam. The John Bowles published engraving that Hull refers to shows ‘George Fox’ leaning and listening to the woman preaching. There is little evidence to confirm his identity and this print edition Hull refers to was made circa 1723.

For many years, the enigmatic portrait of George Fox attributed to Sir Peter Lely was thought to have been painted in Fox’s lifetime. The painting was bought in 1858 at an antique shop in London by John Wethered, an American congressman. The name Geo Fox written on the back of the canvas was apparently inscribed many years later.

(Library reference: LSF Pic Vol II/1) George Fox artist unknown, early 19thC.

After Wethered’s death, the portrait was donated to Swarthmore College where it currently resides. In a letter dated 1931 written by Alfred M. Brooks, professor of Fine Arts at Swarthmore College, the painting was authenticated as not being the work of Lely. It is another artistic representation of George Fox (allegedly) and in any case not painted in his lifetime.

In 1923, Library acquired an oil painting entitled Geo Fox, first Quaker which is painted in red on the canvas, located bottom right corner. This was not Fox at all, but John West (1690-1776), father of the artist Benjamin West (1738- 1820) who painted it. John West did become a Quaker later in life in 1759. This lovely portrait was painted circa 1765 and shows West’s father in typical 18th century Quaker male clothing. This is another example of how someone inscribed the name of George Fox on the canvas in order to sell it.

(Library reference: LSF F048) John West by Benjamin West, c.1765

I have always liked a little woodcut of George Fox and was sad to find that it was from the 19th century not 17th. In correspondence files from 1994, it was confirmed that the small portrait was printed and donated by Joseph Smith (1819-1896). According to a note in the Library’s MS Portfolio 20, describing its (unknown) origin, this ‘rude woodcut’ is believed to have been printed in ‘some publication’ during Fox’s lifetime. Sadly we do not know the name and date of the publication but nevertheless, this woodcut seems to have been influential in the evolution of Fox’s image, as the note suggests three prints were derived from this “17th century” portrait.

(Library reference: LSF MS Vol 339) Geo. Fox by unknown (woodcut), 19th century

The first of these portraits was published in 1822. The artist is unknown but in relation to the woodcut, has a similar pose though sitter is looking left and the hat is turned up.

The second is a lithograph drawn by William Dance published by Thomas Stackhouse in 1824, with deep set eyes and hat similar to the woodcut.

The third is engraved and published by Samuel Allen after a painting by Samuel Chinn sold by Harvey & Darton, 1838, with a thinner face and stature and, dare I say it, looking rather like the Quaker Oats logo (though their logo wasn’t created until 1877 and borrowed heavily from well-known published engravings of William Penn). This rendition of GF is artistically better executed than the woodcut and some other previous versions.


Searching online, there are many more similar portraits all depicting an older man with shoulder length grey hair wearing a wide brim hat and cravat. Many of these variations of ‘George Fox’ seem to come from a lithograph drawn by Thomas Fairland, published by William Darton & Son circa 1830s. It adds to a long list of portraits in circulation, printed by various publishers, all borrowing heavily from each other on pose, dress and style.

(Library reference: Pic L3_6) GF lithograph by Fairland published by William Darton & Son c.1830

The main publisher for these prints was Quaker William Darton (1755-1819) who began his business in 1787 as a printer, engraver and book publisher in London under W. Darton & Co. then partnership with another Quaker, Joseph Harvey (1764-1841), setting up the firm of Darton & Harvey.

Turning briefly to sculpture, the library has an imposing bronze bust of George Fox by Sir Alfred Turner (1874-1940). Donated to the Library in 1906, Turner based the bust on numerous portraits of GF and the death mask of Oliver Cromwell to create a sense of strength and dignity. The bust was commissioned by the donor and was created in 1901.

(Library reference: LSF RROB1) George Fox by Sir Alfred Turner, 1901

Quaker painter and print maker, Robert Spence (1871-1964), took it upon himself to illustrate George Fox’s Journal. Born in Tynemouth, son of the artist Charles Spence, he studied in Newcastle, at Slade School of Fine Art and in Paris. His father was a great collector of Quaker material and had inherited the Spence Collection of manuscripts, which includes the hand written manuscript of George Fox’s Journal and other works by early Friends. When this manuscript was rebound, the first six pages are dedicated to the various published portraits of George Fox!

Spence’s etchings show scenes described in George Fox’s Journal, and were created over a number of years with the earliest in 1892, the latest in 1954. His portrait of George Fox at Swarthmoor Hall, made in 1950, was used for the front cover of revised edition of The Journal of George Fox by John L. Nickalls, 1997 printing.

(Library reference: LSF SE_1) detail of George Fox at Swarthmoor Hall by Robert Spence, c.1950

The ongoing curiosity of what George Fox looked like continues into the 21st century. On the cover of The Friend (28 April 2023), artificial intelligence tool, Open Art generated a portrait with the prompt ‘George Fox age 28 wearing hat, standing on Pendle Hill in a modern painting’. The result was a composite of all the George Fox’s portraits currently circulating on the Internet. After looking at countless GF’s as a middle aged man, it is fascinating to see an artistic representation of a younger man.

As the centuries pass and artistic styles change, the continuing evolution of George Fox’s portrait will too. There is nothing wrong in an attempt to visualise an influential enigmatic Friend whose charisma and teaching had such a profound effect on the spiritual growth of Quakerism.

Melissa Atkinson, Special Collections Curator

George Fox, AI generated by Open Art, 2023, from The Friend, 28 April 2023.

References:

Nickalls, John, Some Quaker Portraits Certain and Uncertain,
London : Friends Historical Society ; Philadelphia, Pa. : Friends Historical Association, 1958 pages 7-9

Whitten, Wilfred, Quaker Pictures [first series]
London : Headley Brothers, ; 1897, pages 1-7

Punshon, John, Portrait in Grey: a short history of the Quakers
London : Society of Friends. London Yearly Meeting. Quaker Home Service, 1984. page 38

Hull, William ‘Heemskerck’s Quaker Meeting’. In Bulletin of Friends Historical Association Philadelphia, vol. 27 (Spring 1938), pages 17-58

Von Effra, Helmut and Staley, Allen The Paintings of Benjamin West
London: Yale University Press 1986, page 461

The Quaker Meeting by Egbert van Heemskerck on the Royal Collection website, https://www.rct.uk/collection/402980/the-quaker-meeting

The Quaker’s Meeting after Egbert van Heemskerck published by John Bowles, c1723-1768. On the British Museum website: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1871-0211-18

The Friend 28 April 2023, volume 181, no. 17 The Friend Publications Ltd., front cover and page 15

LSF Portfolio 20/145 note from Joseph Smith, transcribed by J. Lewellyn Curtis, circa 1890

LSF MS Box 5_18 letter from Alfred M. Brooks Swarthmore College re: Lely painting, dated November 27, 1931

LSF MS BOX V2_4 letter from Burlington Galleries re: Honthorst painting, dated February 9th, 1914

LSF MS Box 6_17 letter from National Portrait Gallery re: Honthorst painting and print, September 27th 1932

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

How a teacup made its way home to tell a story of Quaker activism: working with the Faith Museum

by Melissa Atkinson

For the last few years, I have had the privilege of being involved with a new museum project at Auckland Castle in Bishop Auckland, County Durham. This regeneration project encompassed renovating the castle and its grounds with a new heritage centre, galleries and a museum focusing on the history of faith in Britain.

In August 2014, one of the Project Curators contacted me about the development of the new Faith Museum. It would be the first museum in England to explore a history of faith and belief in the British Isles from prehistory to the present day, using personal histories of faith through rare and compelling objects.

Due to the complexity of organising an exhibition and borrowing material from other institutions, museum exhibition planning and preparation are developed up to ten years in advance. Large-scale projects evolve over time, budgets are cut, pandemics intervene and plans change, so the Faith Museum itself has evolved, producing a gallery layout that is now thematic, rather than based on a chronological approach. The objects have been selected from their own collections, as well as private and public collections such as ours.


Constantine Fine Art transport team in the Library, packing the teacup and saucer for its move up north

The Library’s collections encompass a vast range of material such as letters, diaries and objects from people involved with the beginning of Quakerism. Letters written by Anne Audland (1627-1705), a minister jailed at Auckland for preaching, are one example. Quakerism had a strong following in the North East and at Auckland a building was bought for use as a meeting house in 1686.

Due to space limitation and the need for other stories to be told, a long list of potential objects to loan was eventually narrowed down to an “abolitionist” teacup and saucer with direct links to the North East.

The teacup and saucer were part of larger tea set owned by Quakers Joseph Taylor (1783-1860) and Elizabeth [nee Harris] (1788-1873) and their 12 children, of Middlesbrough. The family boycotted sugar produced on plantations using slave labour. This tea set and others like it helped raised awareness of the issues and promoted the campaign.  

Abolitionist cup and saucer on loan for 3 years to the Faith Museum (LSF 37a & 37b)

The teacup and saucer are made of bone china with a transfer print made circa 1820-30 from Staffordshire potteries. Many Quakers joined the campaign to boycott the products of enslavement, such as dyes, cotton and sugar.

In the 1820 to 1830s many female anti-slavery associations were set up. Female campaigners including Elizabeth Heyrick (1769-1831) helped organised a mass sugar boycott, produced leaflets, raised funds and abstained from slave grown sugar.

We’re delighted that a museum object from our collections, with an interesting story shedding light on Quaker witness, can now be on display so close to where it was owned by a Quaker family. Joining over 250 other objects telling the story of multi-faith Britain, our teacup and saucer with their own unique social history can now be seen by a new audience, in a brand new venue.

The Faith Museum opens October 2023. Details can be found here:

https://aucklandproject.org/venues/faith-museum/

Abolitionist cup and saucer along with other objects in display case at the Faith Museum.
Posted in News | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Creating a world without war: project completed

We are delighted to announce that we have completed the core work of the Wellcome Trust funded project to catalogue and preserve the records of the Friends Ambulance Unit (FAU) and Friends Relief Service (FRS) from World War Two. 

Both collections have been repacked in conservation grade materials, and fully catalogued on our online public access catalogue to make them accessible for research. 

We are very grateful to the Wellcome Trust for funding this work, and their support during the pandemic, and also to our heroic project archivist Jill Geber who managed to maintain a positive attitude throughout, when the pandemic made this project seem at times impossible. 

One of the most important, and satisfying elements of this project was the conservation work. Parts of these collections were completely unfit for use due to their fragility, and most of the collection was in danger of becoming unusable due to the damage being wrought by rusting metal fastenings. Paper was crumbling in some parts, and due to overfilled files and boxes, a lot of the material was under strain.  

Despite the huge setback of not being able to work with the collections for much of 2020, Jill managed to repack the collections, cleaning paper, removing damaging fastenings, transferring into archival quality files, protecting individual documents with melinex sleeves where required, and packing all into acid-free boxes within the project timeframe. One mind-boggling figure which demonstrates the size of the job is the number of brass staples used across the collections: over 9,000! The photos below show the difference which has been made; ensuring these collections suffer no further deterioration.

An example of a file before conservation work. Note dirt at edges of paper, rusting metal fastening causing damage to paper, dirt on file cover making it difficult to handle.
A file after conservation work. The paper has been cleaned with a smoke sponge, delicate pages placed within plastic sleeves, all fastenings removed and papers enclosed in an archive quality folder.

The cataloguing work was the other major task, made no less difficult by the complexity of Quaker organisations; FRS had no less than 12 main committees, some with sub (and sub-sub-) committees, and attached departments for each committee, plus extra departments not governed by committees (phew!). They needed organizational charts to keep track at the time, and Jill created a few herself trying the understand how both organisations functioned. 

One of the attempts at an organisational chart for FAU to help arrange the catalogue series

Both collections are now available on the online catalogues under the below links. Under these top levels records, you will see the hierarchy browser where you can expand to see the whole collections. 

Friends Ambulance Unit World War Two catalogue

Friends Relief Service World War Two catalogue

These collections provide a huge amount for researchers. From detailed insights into day-to-day life in evacuation hostels for children and the elderly in Britain, to high level discussions about how this work influenced development of social services theory for postwar planning; from accounts of incredibly varied medical work in the field in China and North Africa, to eyewitness testimony to the destruction left behind in mainland Europe, and the tangled chaos of the postwar political scene, there is huge scope for new research as well as much for the family historian and those with general interest in humanitarianism and World War Two.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Restore and renew: the Library refurbishment project

Library moodboard

We took the decision in 2020 to try to use the closure of the Library of the Society of Friends due to the pandemic as a positive opportunity, and use the time to carry out some long overdue refurbishment work on our reading room. While there was some necessary maintenance work such as painting and upgrading window blinds, we also thought about how to futureproof use of the room and expand the potential for holding events, creating an ambitious programme of work. We want to share the story so far.

The last major refurbishment of the Library was in 1993. At that time the room had been subdivided to allow staff working space as well as reader space and the decision was taken to strip this out and return the room to sole use for readers; this was also aimed at returning the room to look more like its original design when Friends House opened in 1926.

We have given similar thought to this major refurbishment, knowing it may be another 20-30 years before another opportunity arises to refurbish and change fixtures and fittings.

Inspired by the fabulous photograph of the Library as it was when Friends House first opened in the 1920s, we decided to lift some carpet tiles and see if the original wooden floor beneath was intact…..it was, albeit with some sections removed for electrical wiring. We took the decision to restore the wooden floor which will be the centerpiece of the refurbishment programme.

Photo of the Library from the 1920s

We considered how the space in the room is being used currently and what improvements might be made, taking into account ideas for outreach, events we have held in the past, and other colleagues in Britain Yearly Meeting who use events spaces. While protecting a research space is paramount for our service, we also want the Library to be a space that works for other stakeholders, including Quakers during Yearly Meeting and on visits to Friends House.

With that in mind we are removing some of the larger fixed pieces of furniture to create a more flexible space for events. We look forward to Quakers and colleagues sharing creative ideas about events and activities the room could be used for.

Continuing the theme of creating a more welcoming space for all, we are replacing the enquiry desk with something less imposing and accessible for all users, and hopefully installing glass paneled doors so people can see what’s on offer from outside the Library.

Achieving this programme of work in a listed building, while at the same time protecting our collections from the inevitable dust, debris and paint, is a huge task, not made any easier by our current reduced access to Friends House and Covid-safe working practices. We have removed many of the more vulnerable and valuable collections from the room for their protection including a nervous day with art handlers removing sculpture from the high alcoves in the room!

Removal of statue from high alcove

As always with building works, unforeseen setbacks have occurred including the need to update wiring in the room, as well as the supply issues which we have all heard about in the news. We are learning a lot about the challenges our Facilities team face in their work, increasing our admiration for their positive, can-do attitude!

We also have a huge game of Tetris to fit collections back into the room and our basement storage with reduced shelf space which will keep us occupied for the next few months.

We are grateful for the patience of our readers during this time, and currently hope to be able to welcome readers back to the new and improved space in early 2022. Keep an eye on the Visit the Library page on our website for further updates closer to the time.

We are now going onsite more frequently and have some access to collections, so invite researchers to get in touch and see what we can do to support their research.

Posted in Collection care, Projects | 8 Comments

Building back better after times of crisis

Normally around this time of year we would be on a stall at the annual History Day run by the Institute of Historical Research at UCL, which gives researchers a chance to meet staff from libraries, archives, museums, and publishers, and gives us all a chance to eat free sweets and collect postcards, bookmarks and other freebies from the different stalls!

This year the event has moved online and there is a programme of online talks which you can check out here: https://historycollections.blogs.sas.ac.uk/programme/. History Day has teamed up with this year’s Being Human festival; Britain’s festival of the humanities which happens every autumn. The theme of this year’s Being Human festival is New Worlds which feels timely given the current global situation. This blog is our contribution to that theme.

Quakers, among others, are talking about the current coronavirus situation and the opportunity it gives us to Build Back Better. This made us think about times in the past when Quakers have similarly sought to turn a crisis into a moment of reflection and opportunity to create a New World on peaceful and more equitable grounds.

Both World Wars in the 20th century were experienced as unprecedented upheavals for society at the time with total breakdown of normal life for many directly involved. Quakers during both wars saw the opportunity provided to rebuild society in a positive way, and we are going to focus on some ideas that feel equally relevant to conversations around building back better today.

World War I was characterised by some Quakers as a failure of the capitalist system, and of empire.  A number of Quakers were self-described socialists while others would have shied away from this label, but they all saw the system in place in Britain at the outbreak of WWI as containing untenable inequalities of wealth and power.

Quakers established a committee, in 1915, to look at these inequalities called the War and Social Order Committee which produced a manifesto: Foundations of a True Social Order in 1918. You can read their manifesto here: https://quakersocialorder.org.uk/

War and Social Order conference report, 1921 Library reference: Box 245/12

Their feelings about the system which had created the climate for global war are summed up in the following quote from Friends Social Union to the Quaker Yearly Meeting in 1915. Reading this quote, it struck us how one could change the word ‘war’ for ‘pandemic’ and apply this to today’s situation.

“The War has brought home to us a grave sense of our personal and corporate responsibility for the social welfare of our country. It is humiliating to find ourselves able to do so little to alleviate the social evils which the war has revealed….Some have become entangled in habits which they find it impossible to simplify without serious injury to the classes whose services they have accepted easily and thoughtlessly…..Others, again, have discovered in their own lives and conduct the same spirit of competitive self-seeking, which in larger spheres and on a wider scale leads to the disastrous cycle of war and war preparation…..As employers, consumers, and investors we are all of us bound up in a network of relations between trade, commerce, finance and national diplomacy, from which we cannot as individuals, break free.” Report of the Friends Social Union to Yearly Meeting 1915

The last sentence applies as much to the newly industrialised world, dependant on problematic empires, of 1915, as it does to today’s globalised consumer-based world dependant on underpaid labour and modern day slavery.

Quakers had some practical suggestions which still resonate today. One was the idea of a ‘state bonus’ which was similar to the idea of a Universal Basic Income being trialled in countries around the world today. This proposal was developed by Quaker couple Denis and Mable Milner who were among the first theorists in Britain to argue for the concept in their publication Scheme for a state bonus: a rational method for solving the social problem(1918).

There were similar ideas around living wage, and workers’ co-operatives so workers could have a real share in the dividends they helped create. Quakers wanted a system that “knows no restriction of race, sex or social class” with materials and land regulated so as to serve the greatest need.

Again although this sounds radical, most of the Quaker activities after the war were more reformist than radical in character and always eminently practical. Quakers were leaders in the Adult School movement which wanted to lift people out of poverty through education, and started a government backed allotments programme which focussed on the alleviation of poverty in industrialised areas. Quaker employers were known for trying to create fairer conditions for their employees although there were not many examples of workers’ co-operatives among the big Quaker businesses.

The War and Social Order Committee became the Industrial and Social Order Committee and continued its work until the early 1960s. We have not had the opportunity to study its later work in much depth (and are not currently onsite to access our collections!) but the organisational history on our catalogue record is possibly revealing. The minutes from Meeting for Sufferings, the corporate body which created committees and laid them down considered, in 1956, that the committee’s work was too ‘unpractical’ and the committee complained of being underfunded. This could mean many things but it could possibly reflect the tension between more radical socialist members of the Society of Friends and those who did not identify as Socialist – was the Committee too polemical?

Meeting for Sufferings goes on, in 1957 to say:

It [the Industrial and Social Order Committee] would need to “work in close association with any committees already in existence which are concerned with particular aspects of the social order, e.g the Penal Reform Committee (qv), the Friends Temperance and Moral Welfare Union (qv). Under present circumstances, the Industrial and Social Order Council will need to keep in touch with the Peace Committee (qv), the East-West Relations Committee (qv) and the Race Relations Committee (qv), since the national and international aspect of the industrial and social order must be reviewed together

Again, this could show an admirable understanding of the intersectional nature of economic justice, or a reluctance to focus on changing economic systems and directly political campaigning.

Obviously there was major disruption to the ideas around development of the new social order by World War II. Quakers had gained a lot of experience in relief work before and after World War I, and World War II would see them become an effective, modern, and influential humanitarian organisation working alongside bodies such as Save the Children and Oxfam. By the end of the war some Quaker humanitarian workers were given influential positions in bodies which looked at how to rebuild better after the devastation of war.

Around two thousand young, full-time, active, keen, men and women pacifists joined the Friends Ambulance Unit and Friends Relief Service organisations during WW2. They were utterly opposed to war as the way to resolve international disputes. They were convinced that damage done by war brought about the worst suffering, not only on those who fought in its battles, but also on the millions of civilians who were caught up in it. They volunteered to work directly in a number of the theatres of war, to contribute in any way possible to alleviate the suffering first at home and later on the battlefields and in the devastation and destruction following the campaigns. 

The FAU and FRS’ approach to chaos of wartime situations was first to conduct surveys of real need in the immediate crises. For example in the Blitz of 1940-1941, members on the ground in London and other British towns and cities quickly analysed and carefully worked out which sections of the bombed-out population affected were in most need; who were being neglected or overlooked by the authorities, and directed their efforts to fill that gap by offering their services of organisation, labour and support to make a difference to the lives of those who were suffering. FAU offered medical and ambulance service and assisted in the organization of shelters and rest centres; FRS offered social service with a real interest in the methods and practice of voluntary social work, of the greatest value to the existing local services which had been thrown into disarray by the devastation. 

FRS members developed an insatiable thirst for social reform, were extremely interested in the experience which came to them and were concerned that the fruits of it should be made available to those who would, in the long run, work in the field.  Useful work was done and in maintaining and spreading the idea of voluntary social work. 

The first example of this was FRS’ pioneering work in addressing the failure of British social policy in providing for the evacuation of old people from bombed-out areas in the Blitz. This experience shone a light on the lack of provision for elderly care in pre-war times as well.

One of the lessons learned, which surprised Quaker relief workers initially, was that many of the elderly were neither grateful nor happy at being removed from their homes and social networks, despite being moved to safer and in some cases materially improved environments. This led Quakers to consider the emotional and social elements required to thrive as well as the physical and logistical. This informed some of their thinking about postwar social care and whether it should happen in the home, or in external institutions such as care homes.

FRS was not the first body to look after old people but it was the first to think carefully about the problem, analyse its elements and call the attention of the authorities and communities to the needs they were meeting. Several FRS members made important contributions to the work of the Rowntree Committee of the Nuffield Trust (Roger Wilson, war-time head of FRS, was a member of the Committee), which made a large-scale enquiry into the needs of the elderly, and whose report, Old People, became a classic work on the subject.

Alan Pickard’s film on life at Oldway House, Wellington, Somerset, Those who are Old aroused enormous interest in what could be done and when in 1945 the Service produced a practical handbook, Hostels for Old People, embodying the experience of FRS workers, it quickly ran through two editions.  Its main lessons were: hostels should be small, so that the residents feel that they belong to a community that is not dominated by the need for administration; residents should be carefully selected, so there may be a reasonable balance of temperaments; and hostels should, as a rule, be mixed.  Through its work among old people, FRS made some contribution to the understanding of their needs in the 20th century British community. Many found their permanent vocation in caring for the elderly; and up and down the country, Friends used the experience gained in and through the FRS to help the old people’s welfare committees which were developing in many districts. 

                                                                         

High Meadow hostel for old people, Pinner, c1940, image from p.100, Quaker Relief by Roger Wilson

Another important activity FAU and FRS members undertook, was work in Citizens’ Advice Bureaux in in the bombed and devastated areas of London and targeted provincial towns and cities.  Citizens’ Advice Bureaux were inaugurated by the National Council of Social Service, and became one of the most valuable of all the war-time developments in the field of social work. The CAB system became a highly popular source of information and assistance to those who were in distress through air raids or other causes and could not pick their way through the maze of wartime regulations and provisions.  FRS always had at its disposal a number of members who were thoroughly familiar with current legislation and regulations that affected the ordinary citizen and could help them navigate bureaucracy to get what they needed in terms of support.

THE WORK OF THE CITIZENS’ ADVICE BUREAU, ELDON HOUSE, CROYDON, ENGLAND, 1940 (D 522) A widow of a civil servant seeks advice about her delayed pension from volunteer Mrs Wraight at the Citizens’ Advice Bureau in Croydon. Mrs Wraight was one of 12 volunteers working at the bureau at this time. Copyright: © IWM. Original Source: http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205197564

This interest in the nuts and bolts of delivery of social care and social services reflects the practical mindset of the projects dealing with poverty after WWI.

The events of World War Two would leave Quakers with two other major areas of campaigning for change over the next decades and continuing today, that of the rights of the refugee, and resistance to nuclear weapons. Again two topics which unfortunately are still so relevant today.

When we think about the New World we want to create after the pandemic is over, we could do worse than reflect on the experiences of the 20th century and the ideas people had to prevent those wars from happening again, many of which would have created a stronger, fairer society better equipped to face today’s challenges.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Creating a world without war cataloguing project begins

Jill at work

Jill, project archivist for FAU-FRS cataloguing project

I joined Friends House Library in January 2020 as Project Archivist.  Over the next 2 years I will be working on a Wellcome Trust Funded project to catalogue the World War Two archives of Friends Ambulance Unit (1939-47) and Friends Relief Service (1943-48) to make them more accessible to researchers.

Through this blog I’ll be giving updates about the project’s progress, as well as sharing stories about interesting records I discover along the way.

I decided that the first collection to be tackled should be the Friends Ambulance Unit (FAU) archives, as it is smaller in size and more straightforward to catalogue. It comprises 47 boxes of material dating from 1938 to 1989. The material is in various formats: files of correspondence, reports and minutes, (some packed too tightly into their original, now unsuitable, 1940s boxes), personnel records, Convoy and Section records from areas of operation (particularly good for China), newspaper clippings, accounting records, drafts of chapters for the official history of FAU, camp diaries, journals, newsletters, bulletins, pamphlets, photographs and films.

Above is a snaphot of some items to show the range of material within the collection: documents in a variety of languages, printed items, photographs, personnel records etc.

The first weeks were spent getting to know the collection by undertaking a brief box listing, paying attention to the condition of the material for conservation planning. Fortunately, the collection seems to be in pretty good condition apart from the fragility of some of the wartime stationery used in the correspondence files and one or two volumes which need more than just basic conservation treatment. The box listing also allowed me to pick up on some files which have privacy/data protection issues, which will be given more consideration later.

The box listing has given me an overall view of the archives and some good pointers to how to approach its cataloguing. A general picture of the various functional bodies within the FAU has emerged, and thanks to some traces of the original filing systems, it has been fairly easy to spot how the record series were originally kept and what functions of the FAU these records reflect. Reading through the Accessions folder for this collection, the old handlists, and a few documents in the FAU files, a clear picture emerged of how the archive was formed from multiple deposits of records between 1947 and 2014.

Luckily for us, the men and women of the FAU had decided even before the war had ended to write a history of the Unit as a record of its achievements and its contribution to the Quaker ideal of pacifism in action. This published official history of the FAU written by A.Tegla Davies, Friends Ambulance Unit – the story of the FAU in the Second World War 1939-1946 (published in 1947) is very readable and includes much detail which is useful in helping me understand the FAU’s organisation and administration.

The next step was to read through all the series of minutes of the FAU’s governing body – its Council, Trustees and of its major Committees – Executive, Staff Meeting, Finance, Publicity and Advisory which contain a wealth of information on the evolution of the FAU’s administration and some snippets of information which were unknown, for example that the FAU attempted to find someone to act a records-keeper-cum archivist, but the Executive Committee sadly reported that ‘no suitable person could be discovered for the position of Archivist’ among its members. [FAU Executive Committee Minutes, 2 Oct 1945 Minute 3571].

All the information gathered from these initial tasks has been written up into a file of notes on the provenance, custodial history and administrative history which will lay the groundwork for the top-level catalogue entries when the cataloguing stage begins.

Having completed these initial tasks of taking intellectual control of the FAU archives, I feel confident that the next stage of careful arrangement of the collection can soon go ahead.

My first impressions of the collection, following the box listing and background reading, was of admiration for the courage and commitment of this group of men and women putting their pacifism into action, doing all they could to relieve the suffering of soldiers and refugees alike in the worst war zones imaginable.

I was struck by what a democratic body the FAU was and how its members constantly strove to organise themselves in the most simple and efficient way to undertake their tasks of medical, ambulance, transport, relief and rehabilitation work, often in the most primitive and physically challenging conditions at home in the Blitz of 1940-41 and then further afield in the war zones.

From an archivist’s perspective, it has been a pleasure to find the administrative history of the FAU so well-documented. I noted with interest how important the documentation and reporting of their work was to the FAU, in the constant and detailed correspondence, official and personal, between overseas Sections and Headquarters.

When the FAU focused on the winding-up of the war-time Unit, its Executive Committee considered what method should be adopted for sorting Unit records and preserving those of permanent value.

It was agreed ‘Basic’ files should be compiled by areas, containing records which should be preserved. The selection should be undertaken by a member with intimate knowledge of each area.  Other papers should be destroyed forthwith. An immediate start should be made with areas in which the Unit’s work has been closed and which has been covered by the Unit’s Historian. [FAU Executive Committee Minutes, 4 March 1946, p 142]

In the final days of the organisation, the following report appeared in the Unit’s last information bulletin:

At Gordon Square [FAU headquarters in London] there has been much desperate activity to ensure that we leave everything neat and tidy by 30th June, when the Last Trump is due to sound.  Operation Huddle involves the closing of the… Ladbroke Grove and Onslow Gardens… hostels, the cessation of the Chronicle, Information and Transport offices, and the amalgamation of Overseas and Personnel with Welfare. The fires have been constantly alight with discarded files – the scandal at Bab-el-louk [FAU HQ in Cairo], the small talk at Rome [HQ in Italy], memories of Whitechapel [London hospital and relief work in the Blitz] and Kutsing [China Convoy HQ] and Vlotho [HQ in Germany] – all have perished in the flames, all save a modest four crates containing basic records for posterity.  When the smoke cleared away, we could make out the infant phoenix of FAU Post-War Service, which will continue to occupy 4 Gordon Square. [Fortnightly Information No. 226, 26 June 1946, p. 3]

That need for rapid and ruthless clearing out of files explains some gaps in the records.

The project’s progress was interrupted in March, when Friends House and the Library had to close because of the Coronavirus pandemic. Working from home has presented new challenges. More research, planning and writing have to take the place of working with the physical records until we can get back to the Library. I’m looking forward to beginning the sorting and arrangement of the FAU archives and returning the files to their original order as far as is possible.

For more information on when the Library will reopen, check our website: https://www.quaker.org.uk/resources/library/visit-the-library

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

Belsen remembered – working with the Holocaust Educational Trust

Friends Relief Service pamphlet c.1945

Friends Relief Service pamphlet c.1945

This year there are several anniversaries coming up, but some of the most poignant, and perhaps relevant in today’s world, are the 75th anniversaries of the liberation of Nazi concentration camps. These anniversaries remind us of the world’s horror in 1945 when the full extent of the Nazis’ persecution of Jews and others was revealed, and help us reflect on what conditions in society had made these crimes possible.

 
Earlier this year we were pleased to contribute to an episode of BBC’s Songs of Praise, which commemorated the liberation of Auschwitz. The programme featured interviews with Ruth Barnett, who came to England on the Kindertransport, and Quaker Peace & Social Witness peace activist Marigold Bentley, filmed in the Library reading room.

Last year we started working with the Holocaust Educational Trust on a powerful project run jointly by the Trust and UCL’s Institute of Education, which is bringing around 1500 schoolchildren to the site of Bergen-Belsen this February and March. Belsen 75 (https://www.belsen75.org.uk/) has put together learning packs for the children to prepare them for this visit, featuring some material from The Star, the weekly magazine published by Friends Relief Service workers to update Quakers about their work.

A team from Friends Relief Service were among the first British relief workers to accompany the British Army into Bergen-Belsen in April 1945. When the FRS team arrived, six days after the Army had got to the camp, they were faced with unimaginable conditions. Thousands of dead remained unburied, and around 40,000 people still living in the camp were suffering extreme malnutrition making them vulnerable to infectious diseases. The conditions were such that the Army would not let the women workers enter the camp for some days.

For some of the team, the conditions they witnessed tested their pacifism, leading them to think at points that they should have supported the use of force to stop Hitler; for most of the team however these thoughts were short-lived and throughout their accounts, they speak of the need to temper reactions to these crimes so the whole German populace were not blamed.

The decision to go into the camp with the Army had taken some deliberation and negotiation, as the Army had issued a non-fraternisation order to all British relief workers in Germany, meaning they were not meant to speak or communicate with the German public. Quakers fought against this, and for a time simply ignored it until the Army relented. Their work was always carried out with a sense that they were trying to create conditions in which future wars would not happen, and they knew recrimination would not pave the way to peace.

The pamphlet below shows a relief workers’ dictionary translated into French and German.

We were very happy that the Belsen 75 project thought the Quaker involvement was an important part of the story for these young people when learning about the liberation of the camp. The spirit of reconciliation shown by the FRS team in the face of these terrible crimes is a message as important in today’s world as it was in 1945.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Women’s History Month

Since March is Women’s History Month, we’re taking the opportunity to highlight some blogposts that have appeared here on Quaker Strongrooms over the years, in case you missed them. And over on Facebook we’ll be bringing you some glimpses of women’s history highlights from the Library collections during the coming weeks.

Last year we blogged about the position of women within the Society of Friends, the role of separate women’s meetings, and the struggle for women to have a voice in the Society: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2019/06/18/respected-friend-women-and-equality-in-the-society-of-friends/. As 17th century Quakers had argued for women to be allowed to preach, and women Friends had a reputation for fearless ministry, this was a surprise even for some Quakers!

Womens Two Weeks Meeting Minute book 1779-1783

Womens Two Weeks Meeting. Minute book 1779-1783

In an earlier Women’s History Month blogpost we gave readers a whistle-stop tour of resources for women’s history in the Library: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2017/03/01/quaker-women-resources-for-womens-history-in-the-library-of-the-society-of-friends/. Whether it’s records of women’s Quaker meetings, pamphlets by seventeenth century women writers, unpublished manuscript diaries, letters and papers, or photographs, there’s a wealth of primary source material. In the blogpost we also listed a few helpful secondary sources for each century.

Quaker meeting attributed to Heemskerk F070

The Quaker Meeting, oil painting attributed to Egbert van Heemskerk, late 17th century (Pic F070)

Other blogposts have focused on some remarkable Quaker women.

Margaret Langdale (1684?-1742) was an early 18th century travelling minister. We pieced together evidence about her travels to Ireland, Holland and America and identified her as the author of a unique broadside in Dutch: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2015/05/29/sole-survivor-a-dutch-broadside-by-an-early-18th-century-woman-friend/.

Broadside by Margaret Langdale, about 1717

Margaret Langdale, Aan de Inwoonderen van de Steden Leeuwaarden, Harlingen, en Workum in Friesland, en Medenblik in Noord-Holland. Published about 1717 (Vol. D/48)

Anne Knight (1786-1862) was a social reformer and feminist. A carte de visite photograph from 1855 among her papers (MS Box W2) inspired our special collections curator to blog about her: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2015/09/18/the-life-of-a-photograph-and-an-extraordinary-woman/.

Anne Knight, photograph by Victor Franck, c.1855 (MS BOX W2)

Catherine Impey of Street (1847-1923) campaigned against racial discrimination and published a pioneering magazine, Anti-Caste from 1888 to 1895: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2012/09/18/catherine-impey-of-street-somerset-and-her-radical-anti-racist-newspaper/.

Twentieth century women have been particularly well-represented on the blog, especially those who contributed in the field of humanitarian relief and peace, thanks to the focus on World War One and its aftermath in recent years. A single blogpost from 2016 describes the contribution of three of these women – Joan Mary Fry, Elizabeth Fox Howard and Francesca Wilson – and details what primary and secondary sources on them you can find here in the Library: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2016/03/23/three-remarkable-women-of-the-twentieth-century-joan-mary-fry-elizabeth-fox-howard-and-francesca-wilson/.

Joan Mary Fry

Joan Mary Fry (1862-1955) (Pic F91)

Two other twentieth century women whose personal papers – letters, diaries and notebooks – are held by the Library are Dorothy Henkel (1886-1983) and Hilda Clark (1881-1955). We have been very lucky to have these papers catalogued by two trainee archivists, who kindly wrote about their subjects for the blog here: https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2013/06/10/a-life-of-quaker-service-in-england-and-germany-from-world-war-i-to-ii-cataloguing-the-papers-of-dorothy-henkel-1886-1983/ and https://quakerstrongrooms.org/2012/07/03/world-war-i-and-its-aftermath-cataloguing-the-papers-of-hilda-clark-1881-1955/.

We hope you enjoy the blogposts – feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below. And look out for our Facebook page updates over the next few weeks.

Posted in Highlights | Tagged | Leave a comment

Theatre: some collection highlights

We hope you enjoyed our blog post back in October exploring some of the many works of fiction in our collections. Returning to the theme, we’d like to focus this time on drama. You might not necessarily think of theatre when you think of our collections at Friends House Library. Our collections do, however, include fascinating items that reflect the changing attitudes of the Society of Friends to the dramatic arts from the 17th century to the present.

During the early days of Quakerism theatres were closed, having been banned at the start of the civil war in 1642. Although some were reopened in 1660, many religious groups were still hostile to drama. It wasn’t just the content of the plays they objected to but the whole experience of going to a playhouse. Early Friends too criticised the nature of plays and playhouses. Influential members of the Society, including William Penn in No Cross, No Crown (1682) and Robert Barclay in his An Apology for the True Christian Divinity (1678), wrote against them.

As well as these texts, our collections include other examples of pamphlets and addresses written by Friends urging people not to frequent theatres.

An Appeal to Men and Women of Reason by Sophia Hume (1765)

An Appeal to Men and Women of Reason by Sophia Hume (1765)

An Address to the Citizens of Bristol (1739)

An Address to the Citizens of Bristol (1739)

John Field even wrote to Queen Anne herself on the subject in 1703:

Officially too, the Society of Friends warned against the dangers of play-going. As the earliest printed Book of Discipline from 1783 warned against the reading of novels, so it also urged Friends to “avoid sports, plays, and all such diversions, as tending to alienate the mind from God, and to deprive the soul of his comfortable presence and power”.

In 1788 a letter was issued by Meeting for Sufferings regarding a recent act that had been passed allowing justices to grant licenses for stage entertainments. Three weeks’ notice was required; this, the letter explained, “may give such friends as reside in the jurisdiction time to interfere”.

Turning to the dramas themselves, our collections generally fall into two categories: works written by Quakers and works that feature Quaker characters. Not surprisingly given Quaker feelings towards theatre at the time, our earliest material falls into the latter category and not all the depictions are entirely flattering. Ezra Kempton Maxfield, writing on Quaker appearances in English stage plays in the late 17th and 18th centuries, observed that “the attitude of playwrights toward Quakers varies all the way from the simply humorous to the downright malicious”.

According to Kempton Maxfield, the first reference to the Quakers in a play was in The Country Innocence, or the Chambermaid turned Quaker by John Leanerd, published in 1677.

In 1921, in an article about the Library, when it was still situated in Devonshire House, the Society of Friends’ former headquarters, Anna L. Littleboy noted of its contents:

The anti-Quaker literature is large in bulk and very curious and interesting. It is not all serious argument or even invective. Sometimes it takes the form of poetry…and there are quite a number of satirical plays, which would make an  interesting study, such as The Country Innocence (1677), The Fair Quaker of Deal (1710), The Quaker’s Opera (1728), and others, most of which are scrupulously catalogued as “Adverse”.

The Quaker's Opera by Thomas Walker (1728)

Misgivings about theatre continued well into the late 19th century, as demonstrated by a series of articles called ‘Quakerism and Recreation’ in the Friends Quarterly Examiner in 1882. But opinions were beginning to soften. Philip Thompson, author of the first of the articles, argued that, “there is assuredly nothing immoral, or opposed to religion, essential to drama in the abstract. And whatever room for improvement there may be, I venture to think that the stage as a whole does not deserve the stigma that has been fastened on it by a large proportion of religious people.”

We even see Friends venturing into writing plays. Arthur E. Tregelles (1835-1911), for example, produced several historical dramas published in the last decade of the 19th century.

Three historical plays by Arthur E Tregelles: The Commonwealth and King Charles II (1891), Queen Elizabeth (1890), King Charles I and King James I (1890)

These trends continued and developed in the twentieth century. As the reputation of the playhouses themselves improved, so Friends saw the medium as a way to explore their values. For example we have a number of plays exploring peace and pacifism:

A sure sign of an acceptance of drama was its use in Quaker schools as demonstrated by this script from Ackworth School in 1910, performed to celebrate the history of the school.

The 1925 edition of Christian Practice included a full page on Drama which explained:

The dramatic faculty, which is latent in every child and is strongly marked in gifted persons, is one which, with due discrimination and under appropriate conditions, may rightly be developed, and the dramatic art is one by which performers and spectators alike may gain a truer insight into human life, a deeper appreciation of its meaning, and wider sympathy with mankind. Friends have refrained in previous generations from supporting the theatre, and even from encouraging the amateur performance of plays, having been led to take this attitude because of the undesirable associations of the stage, the doubtful characters of many plays, and the dangers connected with the actors’ profession. The position has however been considerably altered by the endeavours of the profession itself, and many of its supporters, to make the drama a more healthy and valuable factor in social life. In some respects the old objections still hold good. Undesirable plays are numerous. Yet the drama is also being used for the representation of aspects of life, gay and serious, in such a way as to make it a healthful means both of entertainment and of education. Friends who go to see plays should feel it laid upon them to make a careful choice and to support the good.

Friends continued to feature as characters in plays as well and we have works by some well-known dramatists. Both of the examples below feature George Fox as a character.

This has necessarily been a very brief overview of the Library’s drama collections. If you’d like to carry on exploring you can use our online catalogue to search for plays and publications on the subject of theatre-going. Use the “Expert search” screen to search for publication type = plays, or subject = theatre, narrow your results to a particular period, or combine with other search terms. And for some handy hints on using the catalogue, check out our catalogue search tips here.

Further Reading

Philip Thompson, ‘Quakerism and Recreation I’. In Friends’ Quarterly Examiner, vol. 16, no. 61 (First Month 1882), pp. 130-138.

Anna L. Littleboy, ‘Devonshire House Reference Library’. In Journal of the Friends Historical Society, vol. 18 (3-4) (1921), pp. pp. 66-80. Available online: https://journals.sas.ac.uk/fhs/article/view/3725/3676.

Ezra Kempton Maxfield, ‘The Quakers in English Stage Plays before 1800’. In Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. 45 (1) (March 1930), pp. 256-273.

Frederick J. Nicholson, Quakers and the Arts (London: Friends Home Service Committee, 1968).

Tamara Underiner, ‘Plain Speech Acts: Reading Quakerism with Theatre and Performance Studies’. In Religion, Theatre, and Performance: Acts of Faith, ed. Lance Gharavi (New York & Abingdon: Routledge, 2012).

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Highlights | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments